Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert Keith Webster

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 2, 1981No. 79-5013PublishedCited by 70 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Circuit Judge:

When the defendant in a criminal case adequately raises the affirmative defense of entrapment, the government has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant was predisposed to commit the crime charged. United States v. Dickens, 524 F.2d 441, 444 (5th Cir. 1975). This case presents us with an opportunity to reconsider the long-standing rule of this Circuit permitting introduction of out-of-court statements about the defendant’s reputation and prior criminal conduct in cases where the issue of entrapment has been raised. Despite the fact that no other…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Sorrells v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Sherman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Hampton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by70 opinions

  1. United States of America, in No. 81-1020 v. Jannotti, Harry P. United States of America, in No. 81-1021 v. Schwartz, George XCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  2. State v. ShuckTennessee Supreme Court · 1997
  3. United States v. Augustin Alvarez, Oscar Hernandez, Mario C. Simon, Rolando Rios, Ramon Raymond, Eduardo Portal, Victoriano Concepcion, A/K/A "Macho"Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
  4. United States v. Thomas C. TobiasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
  5. United States v. Gurleon Maxi Jackson, Talmadge Alvin Whitley and Nathan Phillip HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983

65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API