Legal Opinion

Barker v. Board of Commissioners

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1891PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Wyandotte District Court. ACTION by Barker to restrain the collection'of certain taxes. The facts are substantially stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Simpson, C.:

This is an action brought under § 253 of the code by the plaintiff, Thomas J. Barker, against the county commissioners, clerk and treasurer of Wyandotte county, to enjoin the collection of certain taxes and special assessments levied upon plaintiff’s land by pretended authority of chapter 214 of the Laws of 1887, being an act entitled “An act providing for the improvement of county roads.” The facts, as disclosed by the pleadings, evidence, and findings, are substantially as follows: The plaintiff, Thomas J. Barker, is the owner of a tract of land situated in the suburbs…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Noffzigger v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  2. City of Leavenworth v. LaingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  3. Board of Commissioners v. State ex rel. WelchSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kerker v. BocherSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Board of Commissioners v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892
  3. Board of County Commissioners v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of CherryvaleSupreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  5. Board of Commissioners v. BrowneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API