Legal Opinion

Plimpton v. Theos

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 30, 1973No. 6661PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffith, J.

Plaintiff drilled a well for the defendant and brought this action to recover the balance claimed due for the work performed. Defendant claimed that the plaintiff had agreed to drill the well for $1000 which he had paid. Plaintiff claimed he was to be paid at the rate of $6 per foot and that since the well was 700 feet deep he was entitled to $3200 in addition to the $1000 received from the defendant. The sole issue between the parties was whether the oral contract was for a flat rate of $1000 or that the well was to be paid for at the rate of $6 per foot. Trial by the Court, Loughlin, J.,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Guy v. HanleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  2. Kalman v. HutchesonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1971
  3. State v. CornwellSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1952
  4. Buxton v. LanganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1939
  5. Anderson-Nichols & Co. v. PageSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sawin v. CarrSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  2. Polonsky v. McIlwaineSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API