Legal Opinion

Laney v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided November 9, 1932No. 14550Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

Only one bill of exception appears in the record. Upon original submission it was not considered because of a supposed delay in the filing. It is made to appear that it was in fact filed in time. It is shown by said bill that while giving evidence in his own behalf appellant proposed to testify that he was a contributor to a fund to be used for the enforcement of the game laws. The evidence was rejected on objection by the state. It is insisted by appellant that because the state’s case depended on circumstantial evidence the rejected evidence was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Vann, Alias Vance v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1903
  2. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1896
  3. Weatherspoon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API