Legal Opinion
Claim of McMahon v. Gretzula
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 20, 1929PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.
The Standard Accident Insurance Company, through its agents, Huber & Partridge, of Scranton, Pa., issued its *257policy of workmen’s compensation insurance to John B. Gretzula of Throop, Pa. In the declarations attached to the policy it was recited by Gretzula that the location of his factories and other workplaces was as follows: “ 505 Sanderson St., Throop, Pa., and elsewhere in the State of Penna.” The business designated in the declarations was: “ Painting and decorating, including shop.” The policy provides a “ notice ” just above the declarations and in connection therewith, reading: “ The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Matter of Pettit v. RegesNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Claim of Jaabeck v. Theodore A. Crane's Sons Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
- Astrin v. East New York Woodwork Manufacturing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
3Cited by5 opinions
- Claim of Diaz v. Ulster Vegetable Growers Co-operative, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
- Claims of Di Donato v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930
- American Mut. Liability Ins. v. Tuscaloosa Veneer Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1939
- Claim of McMahon v. GretzulaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- Claim of Ginsberg v. Hollywood Luggage Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949