HydroFLOW USA LLC v. HydroTech Solutions LLC
District Court, W.D. Washington
1Opinion
THE HONORABLE JOHN C. COUGHENOUR 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 HYDROFLOW USA LLC, CASE NO. C21-0714-JCC 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 HYDROTECH SOLUTIONS LLC, 13 Defendant. 14 15 This matter comes before the Court on Defendant HydroTech Solutions, LLC’s Motion 16 to Dismiss, Abate, or in the Alternative, Transfer Venue. (Dkt. No. 16.) Having thoroughly 17 considered the parties’ briefing and the relevant record, the Court finds oral argument 18 unnecessary and hereby GRANTS the motion in part and DENIES it in part for the reasons 19…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Brillhart v. Excess Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Hoffman v. BlaskiSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 291, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 398 Government Employees Insurance Company v. Alexander Dizol, Special Administrator of the Estate of Kevin Tate Dizol, DeceasedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.