Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Barajas and Meyer v. Northrop Corporation, a California Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 21, 1992No. 91-55026Unpublished
1Opinion of the Court
951 F.2d 365
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
UNITED STATES ex rel. BARAJAS AND MEYER, Plaintiffs-Appellants,
v.
NORTHROP CORPORATION, A California Corporation, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-55026.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and submitted Nov. 6, 1991.
Decided Dec. 12, 1991.
As Amended on Denial of Rehearing Jan. 21, 1992.
Before SNEED, BEEZER and TROTT,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. SchlunkSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United Food Workers Union, Locals 197, 373, 428, 588, 775, 839, 870, 1119, 1179 & 1532 v. Alpha Beta Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.