Andover Develop. Corp. v. City of New Smyrna Beach
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
328 So.2d 231 (1976)
ANDOVER DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, Appellant,
v.
CITY OF NEW SMYRNA BEACH et al., Appellees.
Nos. W-332 and W-342.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
February 10, 1976.
Rehearing Denied March 29, 1976.
George E. Adams, Adams, Gilman & Cooper, Orlando, for appellant.
Noah C. McKinnon and Dale K. Bohner, Coble, McKinnon, Reynolds & Rothert, Daytona Beach, and Charles A. Hall, New Smyrna Beach, for appellees.
Swann & Glass, Coral Gables, for amicus curiae.
RAWLS, Judge.
Zoning is the subject of this imbroglio. Plaintiff-appellant Andover has struggled for years to…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McGautha v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fasano v. Board of County Com'rs of Washington Cty.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Sakolsky v. City of Coral GablesSupreme Court of Florida · 1963
- Chrobuck v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1971
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Margolis v. District Court in & for the County of ArapahoeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- County of Kauai v. Pacific Standard Life InsuranceHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
- Florida Land Co. v. City of Winter SpringsSupreme Court of Florida · 1983
- Transamerica Title Insurance Co. Trust Nos. 8295, 8297, 8298, 8299, 8300 & 8301 v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- The Florida Companies v. Orange County, Fla.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.