Legal Opinion

DuFour v. Matrisch

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided August 27, 2018No. 1:18-cv-01269Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION THEODORE DUFOUR, Plaintiff, No. 18 CV 1269 v. Judge Manish S. Shah STEVE MATRISCH, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff Theodore DuFour applied twice for a recovery permit from the Illinois Commerce Commission. The permit was required to conduct collateral repossessions under the Collateral Recovery Act, 225 ILCS 422/1 et seq. DuFour’s application was denied both times due to his criminal history. DuFour brings this suit against Commission officers under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  4. Woodford v. NgoSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API