Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Frank

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 14, 1942No. Appeals, Nog. 8, 9 and 21PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Rhodes, J.,

Plaintiffs, husband and wife, have appealed from the refusal of the court below to grant a new trial in a trespass action to recover damages for personal injuries sustained by the wife. The trial judge entered a compulsory nonsuit in favor of two of the defendants, and the jury returned a verdict for wife plaintiff in the sum of $200 against the remaining defendant, Warren Frank, and allowed nothing for the husband.

The reason assigned in the court below in support of the motion for new trial was the inadequacy of the verdict. Additional reasons are now. urged in support…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Dugan v. McGara's Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Zamojc v. FisherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Fulcomer v. Pennsylvania RailroadSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. First National Bank v. Monarch Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Patterson v. Pittsburgh Railways Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Daset Mining Corp. v. Industrial Fuels Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Elza v. ChovanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Carpenelli v. Scranton Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Gottlob v. HillegasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. Coleman v. Pittsburgh Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API