Legal Opinion

Leeds and Lippincott Co. v. Nevius

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided July 11, 1958PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

51 N.J. Super. 343 (1958)

144 A.2d 4

LEEDS AND LIPPINCOTT COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF,

v.

ETHEL R. NEVIUS, ADAM S. BORST, RANDAL HOLDEN, MIRIAM E. MELLIN, AND THE REMAINING PREFERRED AND COMMON STOCK-HOLDERS OF LEEDS AND LIPPINCOTT COMPANY AS A CLASS, DEFENDANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided July 11, 1958.

Messrs. Moore, Butler & McGee (Mr. James N. Butler appearing), attorneys for plaintiff.

Messrs. Perskie & Perskie (Mr. David M. Perskie appearing), attorneys for defendant Helen L. Parrish.

Messrs. Archer, Greiner, Hunter & Read, attorneys for…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wabash Railway Co. v. BarclaySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  2. Agnew v. American Ice Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
  3. Briggs v. United Shoe Machinery Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1920
  4. Sanders v. Cuba Railroad Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  5. First National Bank, Fort Lee v. BurdettSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Thomas Gray v. Joseph J. Brunetti Construction Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1959
  2. Leeds and Lippincott Co. v. NeviusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API