Legal Opinion

Flannery v. Flannery

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 20, 1969No. Civ. No. 33803PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

This is an appeal by the remainderman under a trust and the trustee from an order directing the latter to pay the net income from trust funds in his possession to the guardian of an incompetent’s estate under circumstances hereinafter set forth. The order being considered as one “instructing ... a trustee” (Prob. Code, §1240), it is appealable as such. (Estate of Ferrall, 33 Cal.2d 202, 204 [200 P.2d 1, 6 A.L.R.2d 142].) As will appear, the incompetent (James Joseph Flannery, referred to as “James”) is the beneficiary not only of the guardianship but of the trust as well.

James’ mother, Marie…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estate of FerrallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Lackmann v. Department of Mental HygieneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Estate of GreenleafCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Estate of FerrallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Hamilton v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Humane Society of Carson City v. First National BankNevada Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ellis v. Hurley CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Ellis v. Hurley CA2/5California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. Olson v. Adkins CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2015
  5. Scott v. McDonald, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API