Schatz v. Schatz

from respondent's military retirement benefit. On March 15, 2012, the district court dismissed the motion with prejudice on the basis that the court lost jurisdiction because neither party had resided in Nevada since October 2011. The court stated that the parties may seek the requested relief in the county of the state where they reside. This appeal followed. In her civil proper person appeal statement, appellant contends that the district court improperly dismissed the entire divorce action, and erred in failing to acknowledge the omitted asset. Appellant further contends that the district…