Legal Opinion
United States v. Ray C. Broce and Broce Construction Company, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided January 9, 1985No. 83-2558, 83-2559PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOHANON, District Judge.
Broce Construction Co. and Ray C. Broce (hereinafter “defendants”) appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the District of Kansas denying their motion to vacate the judgment and sentence entered by that court March 15, 1981, in one of the two cases combined here on appeal. Defendants claim that the judgment and sentence in question are in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution. The district court, without making a finding as to whether the two sentences did in fact violate the Double Jeopardy Clause, found that…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- McMann v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Green v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. BroceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. Michael D. ShinaultCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Commonwealth v. DeeranMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2006
- United States v. Ray C. Broce and Broce Construction Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.