Greenberg v. Brooks Woolen Co.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Richard S. Lane, J.

Plaintiff moves to allow a demand for trial de novo nunc pro tunc.

Arbitration was held April 15, 1988 and resulted in an award in favor of defendant dismissing plaintiff’s cause of action. On June 7, 1988 plaintiff served and filed a new notice *771of trial. Defendant’s following motion to strike from the calendar was granted by me pursuant to decision dated July 29, 1988 (140 Misc 2d 611). In my decision I chided plaintiff for completely ignoring the provisions of part 28 of the Rules of the Chief Judge (22 NYCRR part 28), and invited this motion as the…