Legal Opinion

Columbia Casualty Co. v. Ingram

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 5, 1928No. [No. 88, October Term, 1927.]PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.

The Columbia Casualty Company insured the Colonial Carpet Cleaning' Company “against loss frota the liability imposed by law upon the assured for damages, on account of bodily injuries, * * * accidentally suffered * * * by any person or persons * * * as a result of the ownership., maintenance or use” of a designated automobile. The contract of insurance included an agreement by the insurer to investigate accidents covered by its terms, to. negotiate settlement of claims, and to defend suits for damages, on account of such accidents, on behalf of the assured. It was provided in the policy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Royal Insur. Co. v. DruryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1926
  2. Lewis v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
  3. London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v. CosgriffCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1924

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brohawn v. Transamerica InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Watson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
  3. Antigua Condominium Ass'n v. Melba Investors Atlantic, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. Hankins v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  5. Transamerica Insurance Group v. Stephen George Beem and Wife, Joan Beem, Transamerica Insurance Group v. William Douglas BoothCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API