Legal Opinion

State v. E.D.R.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 22, 2007No. 5D06-2559PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

The State appeals an order suppressing all physical and testimonial evidence seized from E.D.R. by the Orlando Police Department. E.D.R. contended that the officers trespassed on private property and seized evidence without a warrant and absent any recognized exceptions to Fourth Amendment requirements against unreasonable searches and seizures. The undisputed facts show that E.D.R. was asleep, sitting on a porch open to the public, with cocaine in his lap. The State argues the trial court erred because E.D.R. had no expectation of privacy. We agree.

The officers observed E.D.R. with cocaine…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. State v. MorsmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  3. State v. DetlefsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  4. State v. DuhartDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
  5. Koehler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. PereiraDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  2. State v. EDRDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  3. State v. HillDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API