Legal Opinion · Dissent

Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission v. Teamsters Local No. 563

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1977No. 75-43Published

1DissentAbrahamson, J.

The majority concludes that the arbitrator exceeded his powers when he determined that the discharge of Robbins was not for just cause. I respectfully dissent. I believe that the arbitrator acted pursuant to the authority granted him by the collective bargaining agreement and that the majority is improperly substituting its judgment on the merits of the matter for that of the arbitrator.1

*615The collective bargaining agreement was entered into pursuant to the Municipal Employment Relations Act, secs. 111.70-111.77, Stats. Sec. 111.70(1) (d), Stats., defines collective bargaining to include…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Garrity v. Lyle Stuart, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Associated Teachers of Huntington, Inc. v. Board of EducationNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API