Legal Opinion

State v. Higginbotham

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided March 30, 1988No. 19462-KAPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HALL, Chief Judge.

Defendant, Roy Higginbotham, pled guilty to two counts of indecent behavior with a juvenile in violation of LSA-R.S. 14:81. He received two consecutive four year hard labor sentences. On appeal to this court, the sentences were vacated and the case remanded for further articulation and compliance with LSA-C.Cr.P. Art. 894.-1. On remand, the trial judge imposed the same sentences. Defendant has again appealed and again assigns as errors the failure of the trial judge to comply with Article 894.1 and the imposition of a constitutionally excessive sentence.

On the first appeal,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. State v. SepulvadoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
  2. State v. SocoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1983
  3. State v. TullyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. State v. EasonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. State v. DyeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1980

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. HigginbothamLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. State v. EdwardsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API