Legal Opinion
Modeste v. Tesla, Inc.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 18, 2026No. Civil Action No. 2026-2177Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JAMES A. MODESTE, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 26-cv-2177 (CRC) TESLA, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Nationwide claims to be on your side. Yet Plaintiff says it was not on his. After Plaintiff was seriously injured in a car crash, Nationwide allegedly refused to cover his medical expenses despite a duty to do so. Nationwide now moves to dismiss. But its bare-bones motion flouts Local Civil Rule 7(a), and its lone assertion that the complaint fails to state a claim is too conclusory and undeveloped to merit…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Randy Brown v. Whole Foods Market Group, IncCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- United States v. SchiffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
- Hani Abdullah v. Barack ObamaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- Marino v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.