Legal Opinion

O'BANNON v. Schindler

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 26, 2003No. 40A01-0206-CV-200PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOFFMAN, Senior Judge.

Defendants-Appellants, various officials of the executive branch of the State of Indiana (collectively, "the State"), appeal the trial court's grant of the preliminary injunction requested by a class consisting of current and former patients of Muscata-tuck State Development Center. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

The State raises five issues for our review, which we consolidate and restate as:

I. Whether the trial court's grant of an injunction is supported by its findings of fact and conclusions of law.

II. Whether the portion of the injunction relating to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hovey v. State ex rel. CarsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Willett v. ClarkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Goebel v. Blocks & Marbles Brand Toys, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Blair v. AndersonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Logansport State Hospital v. W.S.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kernan v. SchindlerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API