Legal Opinion
In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of Wetterau
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided July 15, 1935PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order of the Surrogate’s Court of Dutchess county in so far as it granted proponent’s motion for a bill of particulars from the contestants in respect of allegations of fraud asserted by them affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements (Matter of Mullin, 143 Misc. 256); the particulars to be served within five days from the entry of the order herein. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Hagarty, Carswell and Scudder, JJ., concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In re the Estate of MullinNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Probate of the Last Will & Testament, & Codicil Thereto, of CarpenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
- In re the Estate of Van RiperNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
- In re the Estate of CarhartNew York Surrogate's Court · 1938
- In re the Probate of the Will of KeutgenNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
- In re the Probate of the Will of DixNew York Surrogate's Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.