Fincher v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
MORROW, Presiding Judge.
Theft is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for a period of two years.
The evidence is sufficient to show the theft by appellant of two slot machines together with certain money that was in them at the time.
It is the contention of the appellant that since a slot machine is a gambling device, his conviction could not be sustained under the statute denouncing theft. The exact question was before this court in Bryant v. State, 87 S. W. (2d) 722, and Smitham v. State, 87 S. W. (2d) 724, in which cases it was held that a slot machine, although…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Bryant v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
- Smitham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
3Cited by1 opinion
- Pointer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979