Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Metcalf v. Texarkana School District

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 24, 1999No. CA 98-800; CA 98-803Published

1ConcurrenceJudith Rogers, Judge

Unfortunately, the arguments in this case on appeal were refined and honed so that the arguments below, which may have had validity, are not properly before us. Thus, I must reluctantly concur in the result in this case. However, I write separately because there are serious issues that need to be mentioned.

Appellants conceded on appeal that the case of McCaskill v. Ft. Smith Public School District, 324 Ark. 488, 921 S.W.2d 945 (1996), was the law of the land and that the trial judge was bound to follow it. In making this concession, the parties abandoned several of the issues that they had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Perry-Casa Public Schools District No. 2Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Western Grove School District v. TerrySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1994
  3. McCaskill v. Fort Smith Public School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API