Legal Opinion

Calley v. Boston & Maine Railroad

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 1, 1943No. 3399PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMarble, J.

Since the bridge in question was a railroad crossing within the meaning of section 1 of chapter 249 of the Public Laws (R. L., c. 299, s. 1), it was the duty of the defendant railroad to keep it in a reasonably safe condition for public use. Pierce v. Railroad, 83 N. H. 466, and cases cited. How far compliance with a detailed administrative order constitutes a defense in actions of this kind need not be determined, for the order on which the railroad here relies is couched in general terms and merely provides “that the proprietors of the Northern Railroad and the proprietors of the Boston &…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McGettigan v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Torre v. Harris-Seybold Co.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  2. Lemery v. O'Shea Dennis, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API