Legal Opinion

Shaw v. One West Bank, Fsb

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 13, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1526Published

1Opinion of the Court

SUMMARY OPINION AND ORDER; NOT INTENDED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTERS UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GREG SHAW, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 13-cv-1526 (RLW) ONEWEST BANK, FSB et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Greg Shaw’s motion to stay the Court’s memorandum opinion and order1 granting in part and denying in part Defendants McCurdy & Candler, LLC (“McCurdy”) and OneWest Bank, FSBs’ (“OneWest”) motions to dismiss the plaintiff’s complaint. Dkt. No. 22. The Court denies this motion. Although styled as…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dyson v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013
  2. Smartgene, Inc. v. Advanced Biological Laboratories, SACourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API