Legal Opinion

State v. McQueen, 08 Ma 24 (12-12-2008)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 2008No. 08 MA 24PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

¶{1} Defendant-appellant Jesse McQueen appeals the decision of the Mahoning County Common Pleas Court that denied his post-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea without holding a hearing. The two primary issues raised in this appeal are: 1) whether trial counsel's alleged ineffectiveness justifies the withdrawal of McQueen's guilty plea; and 2) did the trial court commit error when it did not hold a hearing prior to overruling the motion to withdraw the plea. For the reasons expressed below, the trial court did not abuse its discretion when it denied the post-sentence motion to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  4. State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  5. State v. XieOhio Supreme Court · 1992

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HaynesOhio Supreme Court · 2022
  2. State v. StaffreyOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. State v. MaggardOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. State v. EasterlyOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2022

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API