Legal Opinion

Wallace and Thomas v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided April 13, 2016No. 3D16-0352PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRothenberg, J.

Shakyna Danaya Thomas (“Thomas”) and Arthur Lee Wallace (‘Wallace”), who are husband and'wife, seek a writ of prohibition to prevent further prosecution of the charges against them in this case. Thomas contends that continuation of the prosecution of the charges against her violates her right to a speedy trial pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191, and Wallace contends that further prosecution of him for the offense of accessory after the fact is in violation of the same speedy trial rule and is additionally barred by the statute of limitations under section 775.15(2)(b),…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Butler v. CullenSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
  2. State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 1989
  3. State v. NelsonSupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  4. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. Genden v. FullerSupreme Court of Florida · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  2. Hill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019
  3. McClover v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2017
  4. STATE OF FLORIDA v. JAMELL DEMONSDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
  5. STATE OF FLORIDA v. JORGE TEJEDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API