Skipper v. Handley
Supreme Court of Florida
1Per curiam
The orders herein appealed from were affirmed, Skipper v. Handley, 121 So. R. 792, but a rehearing was granted. Upon further consideration the Court has determined that notwithstanding the contention as to the effect of the supplemental agreement referred to in the former opinion, the facts alleged in this case bring it within the rules announced in Chubb v. Chadwick, 93 Fla. 114, 111 So. R. 538; Wilson v. Daniel, 94 Fla. 1140, 115 So. R. 527, and not within the rules stated in Taylor v. Rawlins, 86 Fla. 279, 97 So. R. 714; 35 A. L. R. 271; 90 Fla. 621, 106 So. R. 424. It is therefore…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Taylor v. RawlinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
- Taylor v. RawlinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1925
- Chubb v. J. Harker Chadwick & Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1927
- Wilson v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1927
3Cited by1 opinion
- Barnett v. DollisonSupreme Court of Florida · 1936