Legal Opinion
Standard Oil Co. v. Markham
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided September 5, 1944PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KNOX, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have brought suit against the Alien Property Custodian pursuant to the 'provisions of Section 9(a) of the Trading with the Enemy Act of October 6, 1917, as amended, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix § 9(a), to establish their alleged ownership to certain contracts, corporate stock, patents, and other property rights which, upon the Custodian’s demand for their possession, he vested in himself under the terms of Vesting Order No.T, dated March 25, 1942; and of another order of May 23, 1944, designated as Supplemental Order 1 to Vesting Order No. 1. The basis of these orders…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. GarvanSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Stoehr v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Cummings v. Deutsche Bank Und DiscontogesellschaftSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Becker Steel Co. of America v. CummingsSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Banco Mexicano De Commercio E Industria v. Deutsche BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brownell, Atty. Gen v. Ketcham Wire & Mfg. CoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
- In re the Accounting of Brooklyn Trust Co.New York Surrogate's Court · 1950