Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Freidus v. Eisenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 31, 1986Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partThompson, J.

While I concur in the majority’s reduction of the jury award to the extent that it excluded the amount representing increased road construction costs because of a failure of proof on that issue, I do not share their view that the jury’s verdict as to use and occupancy of the property in issue must be vacated. *183In this protracted legal war, the major casualty has been Todem Homes, which had the right under an option contract to repurchase 17 acres of the 20-acre parcel in issue. During the pendency of this litigation—a period which exceeds 14 years—the plaintiff, Ella Freidus, has unreasonably…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Merrick Holding Corp. v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Bostwick v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  3. Worrall v. . MunnNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  4. Haffey v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Check-Mate Industries, Inc. v. Say AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API