State v. McCurdy
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Complaint and warrant under provision of Chap. 42, Public Laws of 1907 and amendments thereto. Respondent was adjudged guilty by the Judge of the Municipal Court and an appeal was taken to the Superior Court, Kennebec County, from-which court the case was reported to Law Court upon an agreed statement of facts, the Law Court to determine the legal rights of the parties and to render judgment. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtHanson, J.
This is a prosecution, on complaint and warrant, brought under the provisions of Chap. 42, Public Laws, 1907, and the amendments thereto, Chaps. 54 and 178, Public Laws, 1909, and Chap. 144, Public Laws, 1911, and comes before the court upon the following agreed statement of facts:
“On December 8, 1915, Marion Blondette of Augusta, Maine, complained upon oath before the Judge of the Municipal Court of said Augusta, that she was about to become the mother of a child, which if born alive would be a bastard, and accused David McCurdy of Gardiner, Maine, of being the father thereof. The Judge…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Koep v. KargerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- State v. LindskogSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
- In Re Estate of KargerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Jung v. St. Paul Fire Department Relief Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
- Bouchard v. FrostSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.