Legal Opinion
Schenkberg v. Treadwell
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided June 26, 1905Published
Appeal from Municipal Court, Borough of Manhattan, Tenth District. Action by Eliza M. Schenkberg against George A. Treadwell and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Per curiam
This judgment should be affirmed, with costs. See Bartholomae et al., Ex’rs, v. Kaufman, 47 N. Y. Super. Ct. 552, affirmed in 91 N. Y. 654 (see, for opinion, 16 N. Y. Wkly. Dig. 127); Thistle v. Jones, 45 Misc. Rep. 215, 92 N. Y. Supp. 113; Nelligan v. Campbell, 47 N. Y. St. Rep. 576, 20 N. Y. Supp. 234; Dickson’s Ex’r v. Thomas, 97 Pa. 286; Behrens v Insurance Co., 64 Iowa, 22, 19 N. W. 838.
8Judgment affirmed, with costs.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Behrens v. Germania Fire Ins.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1884
- Thistle v. Jones, New York County Courts1904
- Nelligan v. CampbellNew York Supreme Court · 1892