Legal Opinion

Marine Solution Services, Inc. v. Horton

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2003No. S-9916, S-9935PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

Thomas Horton suffered compound fractures in both legs while moving a barge from Pickworth Dock in Anchorage. Horton sued Marine Solution Services, the owner of the vessel and the company for which he served as president and chief executive officer, for unseaworthiness under traditional maritime law and for negligence under the Jones Act. A jury returned a verdict for Horton and awarded him $1,184,878.85. Marine Solution Services appeals several of the jury instructions, focusing on whether Horton was an employee and seaman entitled to a remedy under…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. The PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  3. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. United States v. Reliable Transfer Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. McDermott International, Inc. v. WilanderSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wills v. Amerada Hess Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  2. Wills v. Amerada Hess Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
  3. Gold Dust Mines, Inc. v. Little Squaw Gold Mining Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Endicott v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Endicott v. Icicle Seafoods, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2010

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API