Legal Opinion

Pool v. Napier

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided February 11, 1910PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Jasper District Court. — Hon. W. G. Clements, Judge. Suit for the partition of real estate. The trial court granted plaintiffs the relief demanded, and defendants appeal. — Reversed.

1Opinion of the CourtDeemer, C. J.

Plaintiffs and the defendant Ola Napier are the children and heirs at law of Ruth and Jonathan M. Pool, deceased, and defendants Olga Napier and Opal Napier are minor children óf Ola Napier. Ola Napier is also the administratrix of the estate of Jonathan M. Pool, deceased. The parties each claim the real estate in controversy under the last will and testament of Ruth Pool, deceased. The material parts of this will read as follows;

*700I. I give, devise and bequeath unto my beloved husband, Jonathan M. Pool, the use and benefit of all my property both real and personal of whatsoever kind or nature,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Law v. DouglassSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Steiff v. SeibertSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Mack v. ProctorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. Webb v. WebbSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  5. Bills v. BillsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Todd v. StewartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
  2. Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  3. Boekemier v. BoekemierSupreme Court of Iowa · 1912
  4. In re Estate of BeatySupreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  5. Brookover v. BranyanIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API