State v. Thiel
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CLEARY, Chief Judge.
Appealing a conviction of fifth-degree possession of a controlled substance, appellant argues that the district court erred by *609denying his motions for suppression and dismissal because his right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures was violated during a traffic stop and subsequent search of his vehicle and because Minnesota’s classification of marijuana as a Schedule I substance violates his right to equal protection of the law. He also argues that the district court denied him the right to present a defense by excluding evidence of his California…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- James David Clark v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Iowa v. Pamela Mildred MiddlekauffSupreme Court of Iowa · 2022
- State of Minnesota v. Aaron James HelgesonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- State of Minnesota v. Amanda Sue ThorneCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014
- State of Minnesota v. Bradley D. FordyceCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2014