Legal Opinion

Romain v. State Div. of Human Rights

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 13, 2013PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In a proceeding, in effect, pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the New York State Division of Human Rights dated June 28, 2011, which dismissed the petitioner’s administrative complaint, upon a finding that there was no probable cause to believe that Capital One, N.A., doing business as Capital One Bank, engaged in an unlawful discriminatory practice in terminating the petitioner’s employment, the petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), entered October 28, 2011, which denied the amended petition and dismissed the proceeding.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Halperin v. City of New RochelleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Maltsev v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Rauch v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Matter of Cappuccia v. New York State Div. of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
  2. Matter of Horowitz v. FosterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
  3. Matter of Ferguson v. New York State Div. of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API