Legal Opinion

Byerly v. Madsen

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 15, 1985No. 6178-7-IIIPublished

1Opinion of the Court

41 Wn. App. 495 (1985)

704 P.2d 1236

MARION JACQUELINE BYERLY, Individually and as Personal Representative, ET AL, Respondents,

v.

ARTHUR J. MADSEN, ET AL, Appellants.

No. 6178-7-III.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

August 15, 1985.

Michael J. Hemovich, Carl Oreskovich, and Hemovich & Nappi, for appellant Madsen.

Frank Johnson, Patrick Connelly, and MacGillivray & Jones, for appellant Sacred Heart Medical Center.

Terence Whitten, Clark Richards, and Lukins & Annis, for appellant Allen.

Ronald Mullin and Mullin, Etter & Cronin, P.S., for respondents.

McINTURFF, A.C.J.

Defendants, Drs.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Carroll v. JunkerWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Pedroza v. BryantWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Pederson v. DumouchelWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Gardner v. MaloneWashington Supreme Court · 1962

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API