Polk v. Biles
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIPS, Judge.
The first question we resolve, the second argued, is whether the court erred in denying defendants’ motions for a directed verdict and judgment notwithstanding the verdict. The basis for the motions was not that the defendants were not negligent in driving their garbage truck into plaintiffs car, but that the evidence does not indicate that she was injured as a consequence. Injury, damage, or loss is, of course, a requisite of any negligence action. But the injury, damage or loss does not have to be either extensive, permanent, serious or substantial; it only has to be actual.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jenkins v. STARRETT CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Cherry v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Glace v. Town of Pilot MountainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Chandler v. MORELAND CHEMICAL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Dixon v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
3Cited by5 opinions
- Springs v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Day v. BrantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Day v. BrantCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Springs v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
- Washington v. N.C. D.O.C.North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2004