Rozanski v. Fitch
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified on the law, and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: Although defendant appeals from two separate orders denying her motions to dismiss various causes of action asserted by plaintiffs, resolution of both appeals requires that we review only this order denying her motion under CPLR 3211 (a) (7); 3024 (a) to dismiss plaintiffs’ amended complaint.
The amended complaint contains 18 causes of action. The first six sound in negligence; the seventh through twelfth allege defamation; and the thirteenth through eighteenth assert…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Fischer v. MaloneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Garrison v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Privitera v. Town of PhelpsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Weidman v. KetchamNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Demas v. LevitskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Sweeney v. Prisoners' Legal Services of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Ghaly v. MardirosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Baliva v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Durepo v. Flower City Television Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.