Salcido v. Zarek
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM **
Sixto Salcido, a California state prisoner, appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the defendant prison medical officials in his action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He argues that there were triable issues of fact as to whether the defendants exhibited “deliberate indifference” to his pain, that the district court abused its discretion by not appointing him counsel and an expert witness, and that the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion for reconsideration and leave to amend. Because the parties are aware of the facts and proceedings…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Lance Jett v. M. Penner, D. Peterson, and Cheryl K. Pliler, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- John C. McGuckin v. Dr. Smith John C. Medlen, Dr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Agyeman v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Wmx Technologies, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
3Cited by3 opinions
- (PC) Palacios v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2020
- Hernandez v. LordDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 2024
- Williams 124345 v. WingetDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2025