Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hooe

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 11, 1958No. Appeal, 104PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Wright, J.,

Alfred Hooe was tried and convicted in the Court of Quarter Sessions of Allegheny County on a charge of unlawful possession of heroin as proscribed by Section 4 of the Act of 1917, P. L. 758, as amended, 35 P.S. 854. Robert Heflin was also convicted on a similar charge arising out of the same factual situation. Hooe’s motions for a new trial and in arrest of judgment were refused by the court below, and sentence was imposed. This appeal followed.

On July 9,1957, officers Puskas and Barrett, patrolmen assigned to the narcotics squad, were cruising in the Hill District of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. NasutiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Commonwealth v. ThurmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  3. United States v. CurzioCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1948
  4. Commonwealth v. OlitskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Commonwealth v. BozziSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. TownsendSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Commonwealth v. BodenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Commonwealth v. YapleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Commonwealth v. WhalenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  5. Commonwealth v. LewisSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API