Legal Opinion

People v. Simmons

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1989PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the court should have instructed the jury to consider the charges of assault in the first degree and attempted murder in the second degree in the alternative, and that the verdict finding defendant guilty of both charges is inconsistent. Defendant did not preserve these issues for review because he neither objected to the court’s charge nor objected to the verdict as inconsistent before the jury was discharged (see, People v Stahl, 53 NY2d 1048, 1050).

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying defendant’s request…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. BrathwaiteNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. PapernoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. People v. StahlNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. People v. PoplisNew York Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. People v. TruesdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. PearsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  2. People v. WorksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. People v. BobbittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  4. Raines v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API