Legal Opinion

United States v. Matthew Staton

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided March 26, 2015No. 13-4815, 13-4816UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION *

SHWARTZ, Circuit Judge.

Matthew and Barrett Staton appeal their convictions and sentences related to a fraudulent scheme involving their photocopier brokerage businesses. We will affirm.

I

Barrett Staton owned copier broker businesses (“Businesses”) that employed Matthew Staton and William Haken, Jr., as salesmen. Through the Businesses, Barrett and his team brokered deals between organizations wishing to obtain office copying equipment and financing companies that fund office copier leases. Their customers typically, completed a lease agreement and credit application for the equipment…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Richardson v. MarshSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. TomkoCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rivera v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2016
  2. ESTEVEZ-FIGUEREDO v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API