Legal Opinion

Tenenbaum v. Long Beach Memorial Hospital

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 15, 1994PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs, cross motion denied, motions granted and complaint dismissed. Memorandum: Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in *974granting plaintiffs’ cross motion for leave to amend the complaint to assert a cause of action for fraud based on allegations that defendants intentionally concealed knowledge of the presence of a needle in the body of plaintiff Ben Tenenbaum following surgery. The proposed amendment "plainly lacks merit” (Mathiesen v Mead, 168 AD2d 736). Plaintiffs failed to make a showing that either defendant intentionally…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mathiesen v. MeadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Farrell v. K.J.D.E. Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Harr v. BiernbaumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API