Legal Opinion

Stolz v. Ginsburg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1926PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This action cannot be maintained by the plaintiff under section 59 of the Stock Corporation Law (See Billings v. Trask, 30 Hun, 314); nor under section 47 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended in 1910, because that section, as amended, relates only to the property of the corporation. Plaintiff claims the complaint may be sustained under section 91-a of the General Corporation Law. There is not in the complaint, however, any allegation of negligence nor, stripped of legal conclusions, any allegation showing injury to or losses of the funds or property of the corporation, which allegations are…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bryce v. National City BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1937
  2. Bryce v. National City Bank of New RochelleDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1937
  3. Klages v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
  4. Waters v. SpaltNew York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. American Broadcasting-Paramount Theatres, Inc. v. FryeNew York Court of Appeals · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API