Dawley v. Dawley's Estate
Supreme Court of Colorado
Error to Weld District Court. Hon. Neil F. Graham, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtScott, J.
It is plain that the question of heirship is not involved in the case, except in so far as it may bear upon that of consideration. Neither is it claimed that the contract in any way constitutes a will. It is conceded by the claimant that she must recover as upon a contract or not at all.
We are relieved from much discussion as to the law of the case, by the admission of counsel for the executor, in their brief, of the following legal propositions, well sustained by authority, as follows:
“1. A promise to make provision by will for a valuable consideration, is a valid contract and an action will…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Casey v. GalliSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Randolph v. HelpsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
- Hubbard v. MulliganColorado Court of Appeals · 1899
- St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. v. DearbornCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1894
- Camp v. ByrneSupreme Court of Missouri · 1867
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schofield v. SchofieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Dominguez v. BoothSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
- Dickson v. RetallicSupreme Court of Colorado · 1926
- Cabanillas v. CabanillasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1924
- Berggren v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1919
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.