Wilson v. Hibbert
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Action by Charles IV1. Iiibbert against E. Allen Wilson. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
GRAY, Circuit Judge.
Wilson, the plaintiff in error, an architect by profession, entered into a written contract with one Brown, the owner of a iot of land in the city of Philadelphia, by which it was agreed that lie should build for the said Brown upon said lot 26 houses. The contract was a complete and entire building contract, the houses to be delivered when finished, according to the specifications drawn up by Wilson and accompanying the contract. Eor performance on his pari Wilson was to receive a lump sum, payable in certain instal-ments as the work progressed. By a special stipulation,…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Smith v. HengerTexas Supreme Court · 1950
- Gagnon v. St. Maries Light & Power Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1914
- Jacob Doll & Sons, Inc. v. RibettiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1913
- Murch Bros. Const. Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1913
- Kuptz v. Ralph Sollitt & Sons Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.