Patti J. Roberts v. T.H.E. Insurance Company

*436REBECCA G. BRADLEY, J.

¶ 132. (dissenting). I would affirm the court of appeals1 and hold that Sundog2 is immune from liability under Wisconsin's recreational immunity statute, Wis. Stat. § 895.52(2).3 Sundog meets the statutory requirements to obtain recreational immunity because: (1) it falls within the definition of "owner," which includes "a person. . . that. . . occupies property," and (2) Patti Roberts engaged in a recreational activity on the property occupied by Sundog. See Wis. Stat. § 895.52(l)(d)l., (2)(b). By actually using the land during a charity event, Sundog meets the ordinary…