Legal Opinion

Renville v. Department of Revenue

Oregon Tax Court

Decided March 20, 1973PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carlisle B. Roberts, Judge.

Plaintiffs appealed from the defendant’s Order No. 1-71-32 which required the payment of an Oregon personal income tax deficiency in the principal sum of $2,129.50 for the 1969 tax year.

In 1969, the bowling alley owned by the plaintiffs, husband and wife, was destroyed by fire and they were inclemnified by insurance proceeds. The insurance payments were in excess of the plaintiffs’ adjusted basis in the property and plaintiffs realized a taxable capital gain on this involuntary conversion.

Upon filing their original 1969 federal and Oregon personal income tax…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Brown v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. United States v. Consolidated Edison Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. RATH PACKING COMPANY v. BaconDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1966

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hillenga v. Department of RevenueOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Hillenga v. Dept. of Rev.Oregon Supreme Court · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API